tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1777415855032868397.post5165838321902840373..comments2024-02-29T16:27:16.015+01:00Comments on Salted Patent: EQE 2019 - Paper DPete Pollardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02725722050785717803noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1777415855032868397.post-15051349074397774092020-03-05T15:29:37.525+01:002020-03-05T15:29:37.525+01:00The basic principle - A. 87(1) is that you must cl...The basic principle - A. 87(1) is that you must claim priority of your first application within 12 months. This was CA1.<br />Under certain conditions - A.87(4), you are allowed to "replace" a first application by a new first application. In this case, two requirements are not satisfied - KR is not the same state (for the same state refers to PCT or regional applications that include CAPete Pollardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13914699133722171472noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1777415855032868397.post-5040697666769872162020-03-03T11:06:01.789+01:002020-03-03T11:06:01.789+01:00Hi Pete,
Question for DI/Q4(a) (2019):
First app...Hi Pete,<br /><br />Question for DI/Q4(a) (2019):<br /><br />First application filed in Canada and a subsequent application filed in Korea. Priority of EP was lost due to reason that KR-appl. from which EP-appl. claimed the priority, was not the first application.<br /><br />A. 87(4):<br /><br />"A subsequent application in respect of the same subject-matter as a previous first application Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1777415855032868397.post-54803574808198571222019-03-03T20:10:45.126+01:002019-03-03T20:10:45.126+01:00When I read the paper, I just interpreted it that ...When I read the paper, I just interpreted it that the description of the application was also limited to the copper particles up to 40nm. Looking at it now, it does state that metal particles nanoparticles improve energy storage and that 40m copper increase energy storage. The description describes the effect of increased energy storage. So linguistically, it does match, but I did not do the wordPete Pollardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13914699133722171472noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1777415855032868397.post-88080078024195596392019-03-03T19:44:55.518+01:002019-03-03T19:44:55.518+01:00I meant that they don't give you the exact cla...I meant that they don't give you the exact claim language - when it says "claimed", it means a claim was directed to that subject matter, but you have no idea of which other features. But if something is missing, they will tell you explicitly.Pete Pollardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13914699133722171472noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1777415855032868397.post-22882125502160274902019-03-01T14:02:33.006+01:002019-03-01T14:02:33.006+01:00Dear Pete
Which was your interpretation of paragra...Dear Pete<br />Which was your interpretation of paragraph 002 relating to the content of EP-F1 description?<br />Is it limited to the effect con Cu nanoparticles or does it refer also to metal nanoparticle in general?<br />It changes the answer to status of claim 1 of EP-F2 which claims priority from that.<br />Thank youMartinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1777415855032868397.post-66799864259824811702019-02-28T09:07:30.073+01:002019-02-28T09:07:30.073+01:00Hi - they recited the claim(s) for each patent/app...Hi - they recited the claim(s) for each patent/application - none included foam. Or did you mean something else by "give you the claims" - didn't they give us the claims? <br /><br />Annoying because if they had just recited the foam along with the particles they'd have avoided the distraction. <br /><br />No biggie, just griping. Ericnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1777415855032868397.post-84882038131230050282019-02-28T07:30:32.155+01:002019-02-28T07:30:32.155+01:00Hi Eric,
this is always an issue in DII unless the...Hi Eric,<br />this is always an issue in DII unless they give you the claims. I did not hear anyone else mention it, so I don't if there was something there. I hope you still had enough time to do the rest - there was a lot to work through.Pete Pollardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13914699133722171472noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1777415855032868397.post-61181061873012667812019-02-27T07:34:50.287+01:002019-02-27T07:34:50.287+01:00In the heat of battle it's so hard to figure o...In the heat of battle it's so hard to figure out what issues to identify/dig/sort and what issues to ignore (e.g., because they may not have been intended as issues). <br /><br />EP-F1 shoe sole claim lacked (among other things) polymer foam, which seems to be an essential feature of a shoe sole per para 001. Sole with only nanoparticles is prima facie dysfunctional. Much time burned Ericnoreply@blogger.com