Thursday, March 10, 2022

e-EQE: 10 Mar 2022 - A Exam - copy to try yourself

Updated 15 Mar 22: added blurry preview window problem.
Updated 14 Mar 22: remedy for frozen chat window added
Updated 10 Mar 22 to add problem with missing words in answer.
Today was the e-EQE A Exam (0930-1330 CET - 240 mins). If you want to try yourself, see here for files in English: A-printable-EN (2022), A-printable-FR (2022), A-printable-DE (2022), A-letter-EN (2022). The client's letter was extracted from candidate's answers (sorry, no French or German for the client's letter). The EPO normally makes official copies available in the compendium in the week after the EQE. 

  • The copy/paste seemed reasonably good, although the "ɑ" symbol was missing and had to be added by hand. WISEflow does have an Insert Symbol option, but it is time-consuming. I thought all these copy/paste issues were technically solved 10 years ago :-(. This also suggests that the final version of the exam was not fully tested in the FLOWlock Browser - it is noticeable immediately, and easy to avoid by using letters, such as (a) or (a0).
  • I have not made the exam yet, so I cannot comment on it myself.
  • If you had any issues with the exam, report them as soon as possible to helpdesk@eqe.org. Formally, complaints must be filed no later than midnight on the day of the exam you are complaining about. I have helped update Preston Richard's template for EQE complaints to make the process a little easier, especially after a tiring day. Even if you have miss the formal deadline, submit all complaints that could affect your marking or performance as quickly as possible.

1. Telegram chat groups

  • Join the EQE Telegram groups to discuss issues with other candidates: Main group (306 members), Study group (128 members), ABC&PE-claims (188 members), D&PE-legal (152 members) and Marketplace (69 members). The groups are public, and open to any tutors or candidates. A few rules: treat others with respect, no discussion of cheating, no exchange of large sections of copyrighted materials (use of excerpts for study and discussion allowed). During scheduled exams, no discussion of the exam questions or answers. During mocks, no restrictions.
2. WISEflow, before the exam, after the exam
  • It is now strongly recommended to log-on to WISEflow at least 60 minutes before the start of the first part of each exam. This gives you a chance to see if everything is working. After clicking on the correct exam flow, you enter the flow page. 
  • Early camera check: It is possible to start the FLOWlock/LockDown Browser in the flow page up to 60 minutes before the exam to test your camera and microphone by performing the ID check. 
    • If you do not need to print, you can just stay in the Browser, waiting for the exam to start. 
    • If you need to print using that computer, you must exit the Browser, restart your internet browser, log back in to WISEflow, and enter the flow page again. You will also need to perform the ID check again. 
    • It is also possible to print using a second computer logged into WISEflow, but this second computer must be turned off and out of reach during the exam.
  • Print BEFORE starting the FLOWlock Browser: 10 minutes before the start of the exam, any printable documents will appear on the flow page. Click on the refresh icon (clockwise arrow) or press F5 to see them. 
  • All copies of candidates answers were available 60 mins after the scheduled end of the exam.
  • Last year, there were some problems last year with missing pages in the pdf's, so check them to see if they look complete and report any problem. It was a pdf conversion issue, and the complete answers were correctly submitted and could be easily be reconverted. I have not heard of any similar issues this year. This year, one person had the first letters of each paragraph missing and some words in between were also missing.

3. FLOWlock / LockDown Browser
  • Browser updates: it is now expected that you verify the software at least once in the morning BEFORE each exam. You should be using the latest version of FLOWlock / LockDown Browser
    • To verify: after logging-in to WISEflow, click on the drop down menu next to your name and select "Edit profile" and "Test Browser". This will start the FLOWlock / LockDown Browser, and check that it is up to date. 
    • Several people did report Browser stability problems after updating - everything was fine during their mock exams in February.
  • Browser crashes during A and D: many people had crashes, even with home computers on home networks who had no problems during the mocks. After successfully starting, the Browser spontaneously vanished, with just the desktop backdrop being visible. This issue was seen by some during the mocks. It is unclear what the cause is.
    • if an internet browser can be opened, you can restart WISEflow.
    • if no options are available, you may need to to reboot your computer, and then restart WISEflow.
  • Prepare a backup system: I heard on Monday about someone who had no problems during the mocks, but could not get into any parts of the D exam yesterday because the Browser would not recognise the laptop internal camera (a personal laptop with no external cameras connected). What a disaster - a year of preparation flushed away by WISEflow. If you have had crashes, or you are worried, prepare a backup system and have it in your room, turned off and out of reach:
    • Borrow a computer to which you can have full administrator privileges. The recommended technical specs are very low. Or ask your IT department if they have an old one that they can reset and give you administrator privileges.  
    • You will have the least chance of technical issues if you use a dedicated desktop with one screen (at least 27 inch), one camera, one microphone, one keyboard, one mouse, one loudspeaker device, one printer, direct wired (USB/HDMI) connections to all peripherals, administrator access, cabled (LAN) access. The chances of problems are even more reduced by connecting to a non-company network.
  • Chat window frozen: several many people found after a crash (and logging in again) that chat window remained open in the "Calling representative" or "Contacting invigilation" mode. There was no way to stop it, move it, or to contact an invigilator. This meant that it was not possible to request an unscheduled break, for example, or to report any other issues. At least one person had to waste more time calling the EQE helpdesk telephone number (which has very limited capacityto get back in because the chat was frozen. 
    • helpdesk suggested refreshing - the refresh icon is the "clockwise arrow" at the top left between X and (i). F5 should also work (at least in Windows).
    • if it still does not work, continue working on your exam. If you need to contact the helpdesk, call +49 89 2399 5155 (helpdesk number with very limited capacity).
  • Lost lines from answer: after a FLOWlock Browser crash, rebooting and logging-in, one person reported that they were missing the lines from the last several minutes of thier had been lost, and they had to retype them.
  • Can't find Refresh: Refresh will solve a lot of problems. The refresh icon is the "clockwise arrow" at the top left between X and (i). F5 should also work (at least in Windows).
  • Blurry assignment preview: many candidates have reported this problem. The assignment preview window is the only possibility in FLOWlock to allow side-by-side comparison, so the blurriness makes this unusable. The official guidance received from the helpdesk, both during the mocks and during exams, is to not use the preview window, or that it was due to the individual system.
    • a solution reported in the Telegram groups was to adjust the text zoom ratio in WINDOWS/ Display Settings to 125% before starting the FLOWlock Browser. 
    • Note that this WINDOWS setting cannot be set or reset during the exam. 
    • The zoom level of the FLOWlock Browser and all the tabs can be set during the exam using the selection menu which appears when the (i) icon in the top left is clicked.
    • It is also possible to separately change the zoom level of an assignment tab using CTRL+SCROLL MOUSE, or the (-) and (+) buttons in the assignment tab toolbar. Zoom settings can also be set directly by clicking on the arrow next to the percentage in the assignment tab toolbar.
    • It is only possible to separately change the zoom level of the answer tab using CTRL+SCROLL MOUSE.

16 comments:

  1. Hi Pete - I couldn't use the (alpha) sign in the editor in my claims but managed to provide figure references to other features of the claim e.g. vat (1). I hope I don't get penalised for not putting the alpha sign.

    As for the paper itself, I thought some parts were very confusing especially around the process and paper sheet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. same here - you can't copy the symbol over to the editor so I didn't include it in the end. In hindsight, I should have just put (alpha) but under pressure, I didn't do this. Its a technical issue which I hope candidates don't get marked down for.

      Delete
    2. They will never penalise for this - they always overlook grammatical and language errors, and obvious errors. So long as they understand your answer , it will not be a problem.
      And especially in this case, they will not penalise you for their software bug.

      Delete
    3. You get a mark or two for having figure references in your claims. I've done the other features but I also didn't include the angle as it doesn't recognise the alpha symbol.

      Delete
    4. They will not deduct marks if alpha is missing in your claims.
      As long as you have a couple of reference numbers in your claims, you will get the marks for references.

      Delete
    5. There is a button in the text editor to include special character and there was alpha sign - in case you need for next exams

      Delete
    6. Great thanks Pete. It's reassuring to know that they won't deduct marks if you haven't got the alpha symbol

      Delete
  2. Thank you Pete. I was one of those who experienced a browser crash during paper A. After the crash (and logging in again) the chat window remained open in the "Calling representative" or "Contacting invigilation" mode. There was no way to stop it, move it, or to contact an invigilator. This meant that it was not possible to request an unscheduled break (and I am 6 months pregnant!), for example, or to report any other issues. This has never happened to me before in last year papers or during the mocks.
    In case it is useful, after contacting with helpdesk, the reply regarding the chat window was: if the chat widget is frozen a refresh of the browser may help.
    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for posting your experience. That is horrible - the exams are stressful enough, and the software is so sensitive, it makes it twice as hard when you know you will not easily be able to deal with any problems, or if you are afraid to leave the room. Make sure you submit a complaint.
      Thanks for the tip - I will add it to the posts

      Delete
    2. Thank you Pete. I have just known that my email to helpdesk about the mentioned issues has been forwarded to the Examination board.
      Thank you for the post.

      Delete
  3. Hi Pete,

    for the apparatus claim, i claimed a "device for stamper beating treated plant material" instead of a "stamper machine for making paper pulp".

    Further, my device comprises a "vat (1) for accomodating treated plant material" and a "hammer for stamper beating the treaded plant material comprising a hammer head (2), a hammer shaft (3), and a hammer face (4)" instead of a "vat (1) fitted with a hammer, wherein the hammer comprises [...]"

    Will they deduct marks for alternative wordings/formulations for claim features such as above? I hope they won't as long as there are no clarity issues or unnecesary limitations?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They accept equivalent terms where it does not affect the actual scope of the claim - technically, there is no tangible difference between a device, a machine or an apparatus. The claim is also judged as a whole, so if the vat and hammer need to be linked, it can be done by indicating a structural relationship and/or a functional relationship.

      Delete
  4. Hi Pete

    This exam was quite unclear in terms of the independent claims. I mean, apparatus claim + method claims were straightforward. However, the paper claim was really unclear on how to formulate it. I did it as a "paper obtained by process according to claim x-y, the paper having a tensile strenght of Z".

    How do you think they will mark these? Especially since loads of candidates did this type of PBP-claim. How do you think they will divide the points betweeen the independent claims? My method and apparatus claims are good, but quite worried i will be heavily penalised for the PBP if its in line with A2018 where it was 25 points for a similar (but much more clear) product claim.

    Best regards
    David

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I also found the feature "cellulose fibers homogeneously intermixed with glue" quite unclear as the client gives no further information on how said feature could be verified/measured. At least in reality, such paper claim would not be novel in view of D2 (but who cares about reality in EQE :D)

      Further, a majority of the client letter deals with the machine and method so i hope that claims directed to the machine and method will attract the most marks...but i guess we have to wait until June to find out what the exam commitee had in mind...

      Delete
    2. It depends a lot on what the desired answer is supposed to be, but they will modify the marking if many candidates did it this way. But, they will not award marks for a non-novel claim.

      Delete
  5. Looking closely, it was a completely different exam in German, as the glueing is not described as essential for reaching all advantages in the final paper sheets. There is a missing "thus" in part [0023] compared to the english version. Also the "better circulation" alone makes the machine inventive in the proposed english version exrep solution, somehow they still want the "adding of glue" in the method as well. it's a weird solution. there is a better scope of protection possible for the method with this description including both described ways of adding the glue

    ReplyDelete